Prelomna znanstvena študija je pokazala, da so države, ki so leta 2020 zabeležile najmanj smrti zaradi COVID-19 pred cepljenjem, po uvedbi cepljenja proti COVID-19 doživele "na stotine ali tisoče odstotkov povečanja skupnih smrti".
Študija, ki jo je izvedel K. Beattie z Univerze v Alberti, je pokazala, da je 89,84 % od 145 držav imelo negativen učinek, potem ko so bila na voljo cepljenja proti COVID-19.
To je pripeljalo do zaključka, da bi moral biti statistično pomemben in pretežno pozitiven vzročni vpliv po uvedbi cepiva [..] na skupno število smrti in število primerov na milijon zelo zaskrbljujoč za oblikovalce politike (vir).
Zanimivo je, da je bilo rečeno, da je bila ta študija na voljo pred zaslišanjem na vrhovnem sodišču ZDA, ki je blokiralo cepivo OSHA ali testni mandat, saj je študija pokazala, da v Združenih državah cepljenja proti COVID-19 povzročijo povečano stopnjo prenosa za 38 % in 31-odstotno povečanje umrljivosti in bi bilo kaznivo, če bi primer ne zahteval nasprotovanje pravilu o mandatu.
The researcher of the study “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries,” said that “policymakers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19”.
Due to the vaccine rollout still being in progress a large amount of public data was available enabling analysis to be undertaken to determine whether the public policy treatment produced the desired effect. In order to do so, the researcher implemented a Bayesian causal analysis, comparing both pre-and post-treatment periods.
According to Beattie, the results indicated that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation”(source).
Countries with Less COVID Deaths in 2020 Fared Worse
The study also found that it was countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, etc that had experienced few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 were the ones who appeared to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration.
Mongolia is one of the countries which fared the worst.
“The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million,” according to the researchers.
“We can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”
Countries with Higher Deaths Associated with COVID
The researcher observed that many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 and assumed that they had appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time.
Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths.
Normally, seasonal die-off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend but rather vaccine-induced.
Although attributing the results to the waning effect of COVID-19 vaccine protection and the amount of “breakthrough” cases, the researcher argues that together with the “overwhelming” and “historically unprecedented” quantity of reports of vaccine adverse events in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), (over 16,000 reported deaths at the time of writing) suggests a “highly untested vaccine”
The Warning To Policy Makers
The researcher also made a particularly specific warning to those who create policy and impose mandates due to the fact that their study verifies the correlation between vaccinations and a “substantial increase in death.”
Vaccine mandates were predictably criticised, Beattie states that “If they ever were ethical, which this author disagrees with strongly based on scientific, medical, and research ethics that regard the patient rights to informed consent and non-prejudcial refusal of treatment or experimentation as iterated and agreed to under the Nuremberg Code (Code 1998) and the Human Rights Declaration on Bioethics, as inalienable, essential, and non-negotiable, vaccine mandates under these conditions and results are beyond unethical at this point.”
“They are clearly discriminatory and likely criminal, a determination courts and lawyers will ultimately decide.”
The author has generously shared all results, data, plots, and R code included in this study for the easy replication by others.:
To access all files please refer to this Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
All Causal Impact figures as compiled into multiple PDF pages can be downloaded here: https://drive.