Prijatelji

Radio ZmajČrtomir TavšPrenoviraj.si  Vse z enim izvajalcem Peter ZlodejBojan  AhlinLeon KraljAlpe Adria  Green Vojko  BernardČebelarsko društvo Kobilje - DobrovnikAlmira CatovicMojca ŽugmanNenad VladićAlenka ZapušekMoj VrtRomano Rajkovivanka gantarElena PecaricBranko GaberDušan  Mirić

Zadnji komentarji

Gost

2018-09-18 12:04:15


Dicamba je v uporabi od leta 1967 in ne ubija vseh rastlin, kot navaja padarka Radmila temveč samo ... ... Dicamba is a selective chlorophenoxy herbicide that kills either pre- or post-emergent weeds. It is used in a wide variety of products in the United States. It controls broadleaf weeds and woody plants by affecting the growth of the plants' vascular tissue. Dicamba comes in a number of salt forms. http://npic.orst.edu/ingred/dicamba.html Torej še eno nakladanje padarke PWja. Predno štango držiš AVAAZu in Ricku Patelu, bi bilo dobro vedeti, da je ravno AVAAZ veliki podpornik terorizma in FSA v Siriji. Za AVAAZ pa stoji Žabjekov "prijatelj" Soros. https://www.globalresearch.ca/avaaz-the-lobbyist-that-masquerades-as-online-activism/5314829 Jakec, predno širiš lažne novice se prepričaj kaj je res. Ja? A Florida judge ruled that the government can ban vegetable gardens because they're "ugly." See Example( s ) RATING MOSTLY FALSE WHAT'S TRUE A Florida judge ruled that the community of Miami Shores could enforce local codes restricting vegetable gardens to rear yards only. WHAT'S FALSE The judge did not rule vegetable gardens may be banned altogether because they are "ugly" (or for any other reason). ORIGIN In September 2016, the Free Thought Project web site published an article that led to claims a judge had ruled that “the government” could “ban vegetable gardens” because they’re “ugly”: A Miami-Dade judge became the focus of much-deserved anger when she ruled on an ordinance banning front yard vegetable gardens. The village of Miami Shores, according to the ruling, has every right to take legal action against residents who dare to grow food in their own yards because they are “ugly.” The court’s decision was based on a three-year long legal battle of Tom Carroll and Hermine Ricketts. They were facing a fine of $50 a day, not for robbing banks, or trafficking humans, or running some other criminal enterprise — but for growing their own food. For 17 years, the couple grew their own food in their front yard until one day, the state came knocking. No one was harmed by the couple’s garden, it was entirely organic, and in nearly two decades, not one of their neighbors ever complained. The only injured party in this ridiculous act was the state. According to the tyrannical legislation, all homeowners are subject to the same absurd constraints. Their yards must be covered in grass — that is the law. Predictably, the claim aused widespread outrage on social media due in part to the growing popularity of vegetable gardens and local produce. The rumor was condensed to conclude that a precedent enabling the banning of independent vegetable growth throughout Florida (or all of the U.S.) had been set by a judge because such gardens are unsightly, and that Miami Shores officials wished for all vegetable gardens to be replaced with grass. The “tyrannical” tale also made it to the Miami Herald, which presented a more balanced version of events to readers. As it turned out, Carroll and Ricketts weren’t prohibited “by the government” from growing any and all vegetables; rather, the Miami Shores jurisdiction simply stipulates, as part of local landscaping codes, that such gardens should not be placed in the front yards of homes: A Miami-Dade judge on [25 August 2016] upheld the village’s much-maligned ordinance banning the practice. In a 10-page ruling filled with legal analysis on the definition of vegetables, Circuit Judge Monica Gordo acknowledged she wasn’t quite sure how the gardens ruin the aesthetics of a neighborhood [but] she got to the root of the law: Miami Shores still has every right to decide front-yard veggies make a neighborhood ugly. “Given the high degree of deference that must be given to a democratically elected governmental body … Miami Shores’ ban on vegetable gardens outside of the backyard passes constitutional scrutiny,” Gordo wrote. The upscale village in Northeast Miami-Dade has long insisted it had every right to regulate the look of the community. At a hearing in June, the village’s attorney said vegetable gardens are fine in Miami Shores, as long as they remain out of sight in the backyard. “There is no vegetable ban in Miami Shores,” village attorney Richard Sarafan told the judge. “It’s a farce. A ruse.” Judge Gordo agreed, saying that the village was well within its rights. She noted that Ricketts and Carroll weren’t without options. Code regulations in Miami Shores Village (Division 17, Sec. 536[e]) pertaining to landscaping state that “Vegetable gardens are permitted in rear yards only.” It is true that a Miami Shores couple fought and lost a court battle with the village to retain their front-yard vegetable garden, but the court’s decision in no way “banned vegetable gardens,” much less constituted a sweeping ruling applicable anywhere outside Miami Shores. A local judge simply sided with Miami Shores Village in ruling that the jurisdiction had a right to enforce extant landscaping codes, which permit vegetable gardens in rear yards but not front ones. The couple involved were not prohibited from growing vegetables, simply from doing so in the front yard. The rumor about a vegetable garden ban was one of several that severely distort local controversies over individual management of personal resources such as food and water to suggest the government is hostile to rugged individualists. A similar distortion asserted a man was arrested for collecting rainwater, and another inaccurately claimed Michigan repealed its “Right to Farm Act” (and presumably the right to farm along with it). Gremo naprej ... Novi Svjetski Poredak ... hahahahahahaha, saj nisi resen, no Iz tegale članka je NSP naredil lažno novico. Lepo je povedano, kdo je krivec - še vedno. Černobil. https://www.rt.com/news/405978-boar-radioactive-sweden-chernobyl/ A tebe, Jakec, res ni nič sram, ko se pojavljaš s kopico lažnih novic, podatkov in videov s tube? Anton Komat, kako je kaj s "kemtrailsi"?
Anton Komat: predstavitev nove knjige, intervju na knjižnem sejmu (VIDEO)

Dec 09, 2017

Pogovor med avtorjem Antonom Komatom in voditeljem patrom dr. Karlom Gržanom o trenutni problematiki, stanju duha v naši družbi in novi knjigi Antona

(0)
Komentiraj
Dodaj zaznamek
Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti
Anton Komat: Posvetilo duhovni aristokraciji V.

Nov 19, 2017

Ko se bodo ljudje skupinsko zavedali svoje moči, se bo zgodovina premaknila iz mrliške vežice v evolucijski skok, v transpersonalno mistično zavest, o

(0)
Komentiraj
Dodaj zaznamek
Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti
Anton Komat: Posvetilo duhovni aristokraciji IV.

Nov 18, 2017

Duhovni aristokrat je izviren človek, kakor ga je ustvarila narava, je pogumen in zvest, plemenit in sočuten in ker mu je dana beseda sveta. Za to ni

(2)
Komentiraj
Dodaj zaznamek
Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti

Vsa Čast...upam,da Vas ob kakšni priložnosti osebno spoznam...lp Rijad

hoj Forum 33? Tole spominja na prostozidarje 33+. Sam prašam, ane. joshuainexcaliburpres boditevcvetju

Anton Komat: Posvetilo duhovni aristokraciji III.

Nov 17, 2017

Brezbrižnost, upor ali umik? Brezbrižnost je enaka samomoru, kajti postali boste del nemočne črede zatiranih, tisočim brez obraza in brez upanja. Tore

(5)
Komentiraj
Dodaj zaznamek
Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti

rešitev je vedno bila, je in bo v tvoji notranjosti, kjer je zapis o tvojem poslanstvu in tvojih nalogah na obličju te zemlje. Edino z globljim povezovanjem s svojim bistvom se lahko rešuješ obremenitev, ki te zasužnjujejo. V pretakanju tvojega vdiha in izdiha se nahaja tudi tvoja neumrljiva energija. Lepo jo je spoznati zdaj, ko si še v tem telesu. https://besedemiru.net/

Starodavn mistik so trdili, da je v telesnem vrhunstvu človek bil brez brezkakršno kolih potreb in želja. Vse kar je telo rabilo je izpoljnjeval čisti zrak njegove vrhunsko čiste okolice. Evo zdaj pa imaš. Onesnažujemo okolico, zrak ... in smo tako tik prd tem, da človeštvo pocrka. človekjeediniekonomskisuženjnaplanetupres boditevcvetju

Premalo pravega vedenja /-znanja/,da bi priznaval katerega koli duhovnega aristokrata.Takšnih ni.Edini opis takšnega človeka je v naši brezčasni teološki zapuščini opis Jezusa in vseh vesoljno razsvetljenih.:)* Vesolje samo ciklično spreminja človeškega duha in njegovo fizično podobo-višino,možgansko prostornino in življenjsko dobo..Vesoljno sam svoj človek najprej spreminja sebe,zaradi prebujenega akumuliranega brezčasnega spomina naše vrste. Šele ko se zave tega,lahko gre na pot sprememb lastnega okolja in če mu je dano družbe.Če si pismen in načitan še ni dovolj,je veliko ,veliko premalo. Ne spreminja družbe človek ,ampak vesolje samo,ko to ciklično deluje z različnimi EM frekvencami na naš genom /bit.Bil sem na mnogih predavanjih samooklicanih duhovnih aristokratov in velikokrat me je bilo sram,da sem človek. Lp ;)**

Anton Komat: Posvetilo duhovni aristokraciji II.

Nov 10, 2017

Ujet si v zanko pričakovanja-odvisnost-strah-nasilje. Nenehno nekaj pričakuješ (si želiš, da bi bilo), zato postaneš odvisen od razpleta, ali se bo t

(2)
Komentiraj
Dodaj zaznamek
Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti

hoj Mogoče pa se bodo ljudje prebudili? http://www.novi-svjetski-poredak.com/2017/11/25/povijesni-potez-meksiko-izbacuje-monsantovu-gmo-soju-iz-zemlje/ globalistižritesamisvojegmohranopres boditevcvetju

POVIJESNI POTEZ: Meksiko izbacuje Monsantovu GMO soju iz zemlje
Američka agrokemijska tvrtka Monsanto je izjavila da je Ministarstvo poljoprivrede (SENASICA) ukinulo njezinu dozvolu ko

hoj Nietzsche se je zmotil. prihaja čas, ko bodo države take kot jih še trenutno poznamo preteklost. V sledečem stoletju to je današnje bodo nacionalanosti kakršne poznamo zastarele, vse države bodo priznavale eno globalno oblast. nacionalna suverenost tako ni bila tako dobra ideja. To je napovedal član zamenik zunajnega ministrstva Strobe Talbot v administraciji Clintona v magazinu Time, 20. julija 1992. bližamosefendalizmukakršenjebilpredtisočletipres boditevcvetju